The World's Fastest Crash Course on Past and Current Islamic Behaviors
THE DOCTRINE OF TAQIYYA
To better understand Islam, one must appreciate the thoroughly legalistic nature of the religion. Consider the concept of lying. According to sharia, deception in general—based on the Koran’s terminology, also known as “taqiyya”—is not only permitted in certain situations but sometimes “obligatory.” According to the authoritative Arabic text, Al-Taqiyya fi Al-Islam, “Taqiyya [deception] is of fundamental importance in Islam. Practically every Islamic sect agrees to it and practices it. We can go so far as to say that the practice of taqiyya is mainstream in Islam, and that those few sects not practicing it diverge from the mainstream…. Taqiyya is very prevalent in Islamic politics, especially in the modern era.”
Some erroneously believe that taqiyya is an exclusively Shia doctrine. That is because the Shia have traditionally relied on it due to the fact that, as a minority group interspersed among their traditional enemies, the much more numerous Sunnis, they have historically had more “reason” to dissemble. However, Sunnis living in the West today find themselves in a similar situation, as they are now the minority surrounded by their historic enemies, non-Muslims.
The primary Koranic verse sanctioning deception vis-à-vis non-Muslims states: “Let believers not take for friends and allies infidels instead of believers. Whoever does this shall have no relationship left with Allah—unless you but guard yourselves against them, taking precautions” (3:28; other verses relied on by the ulema include 2:173; 2:185; 4:29; 16:106; 22:78; 40:28).
Al-Tabari’s (d. 923) famous Tafsir (exegesis of the Koran) is essentially a standard reference work in the entire Muslim world. Regarding 3:28, he writes: “If you [Muslim] are under their [infidels’] authority, fearing for yourselves, behave loyally to them, with your tongue, while harboring inner animosity for them…. Allah has forbidden believers from being friendly or on intimate terms with the infidels in place of believers—except when infidels are above them [in authority]. In such a scenario, let them act friendly towards them.”
Regarding 3:28,” Ibn Kathir (d. 1373, second only to Tabari) writes, “Whoever at any time or place fears their [infidels’] evil, may protect himself through outward show.” As proof of this, he quotes Muhammad’s companions: Abu Darda said “Let us smile to the face of some people while our hearts curse them”; while al-Hassan said, “Doing taqiyya is acceptable till the Day of Judgment [i.e., in perpetuity].”
Other prominent ulema, such as al-Qurtubi , al-Razi, and al-Arabi have extended taqiyya to cover deeds. In other words, Muslims can behave like infidels—including by bowing down and worshipping idols and crosses, false testimony, even exposing Muslims’ “weak spots” to the infidel enemy—anything short of actually killing a fellow Muslim.
Is this why the Muslim American soldier, Hasan Akbar, attacked his fellow soldiers in Iraq in 2003? Had his pretence of loyalty finally come up against a wall when he realized Muslims might die at his hands? He had written in his diary: “I may not have killed any Muslims, but being in the army is the same thing. I may have to make a choice very soon on who to kill.”
WAR IS DECEIT
None of this should be surprising considering that Muhammad himself—whose example as the “most perfect human” is to be tenaciously followed—took an expedient view to lying. It is well known, for instance, that Muhammad permitted lying in three situations: to reconcile two or more quarreling parties; to one’s wife; and in war.
As for war, during the Battle of the Trench, which pitted Muhammad and his followers against several non-Muslim tribes (collectively known as “the Confederates”), one Naim bin Masud went to the Muslim camp and converted to Islam. When Muhammad discovered that the Confederates were unaware of Masud’s conversion, he counseled him to return and try somehow to get the Confederates to abandon the siege—“For,” Muhammad assured him, “war is deceit.” Masud returned to the Confederates without their knowledge that he had “switched sides,” and began giving his former kin and allies bad advice. He also went to great lengths to instigate quarrels between the various tribes until, thoroughly distrusting each other, they disbanded, lifting the siege from the Muslims.
More demonstrative of the legitimacy of deception vis-à-vis infidels is the following anecdote. A poet, Kab bin al-Ashruf, had offended Muhammad by making derogatory verse concerning Muslim women. Muhammad exclaimed in front of his followers: “Who will kill this man who has hurt Allah and his prophet?” A young Muslim named Muhammad bin Maslama volunteered, but with the caveat that, in order to get close enough to Kab to assassinate him, he be allowed to lie to the poet. Muhammad agreed. Maslama traveled to Kab, began denigrating Islam and Muhammad, carrying on this way till his disaffection became convincing enough that Kab took him into his confidences. Soon thereafter, Maslama appeared with another Muslim and, while Kab’s guard was down, they assaulted and killed him. One version reports that they ran to Muhammad with Kab’s head, to which the latter cried “Allahu Akbar!” (God is great!)
It also bears mentioning that the entire sequence of Koranic revelations are a testimony to taqiyya; and since Allah is believed to be the revealer of these verses, he ultimately is seen as the perpetrator of deceit—which is not surprising since Allah himself is described in the Koran as the “best deceiver” (3:54). This phenomenon revolves around the fact that the Koran contains both peaceful and tolerant verses, as well as violent and intolerant ones. The ulema were baffled as to which verses to codify into sharia’s worldview—the one, for instance, that states there is no coercion in religion (2:256), or the ones that command believers to fight all non-Muslims till they either convert or at least submit to Islam (9:5, 9:29)? To get out of this quandary, they developed the doctrine of abrogation (naskh, supported by Koran 2:105) which essentially states that verses “revealed” later in Muhammad’s career take precedence over the earlier ones whenever there is a contradiction.
But why the contradiction in the first place? The standard answer has been that, since in the early years of Islam, Muhammad and his community were far outnumbered by the infidels, a message of peace and co-existence was in order. However, after he migrated to Medina and grew in military strength and numbers, the violent and intolerant verses were revealed, urging Muslims to go on the offensive. According to this standard view, one can only conclude that the peaceful Meccan verses were ultimately a ruse to buy Islam time till it became sufficiently strong enough to implement the “true” verses. Or, as traditionally understood and implemented, when Muslims are weak, they should preach and behave according to the Meccan verses; when strong, they should go on the offensive, according to the Medinan verses.
WAR IS ETERNAL
The fact that Islam legitimizes deceit during war cannot be all that surprising; after all, Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, and Hobbes all justified deceit in war. The problem, however, is that, according to all four recognized schools of Sunni jurisprudence, war against the infidel goes on in perpetuity—until “all chaos ceases, and all religion belongs to Allah” (Koran 8:38). The definitive Encyclopaedia of Islam simply states:
“The duty of the jihad exists as long as the universal domination of Islam has not been attained. Peace with non-Muslim nations is, therefore, a provisional state of affairs only; the chance of circumstances alone can justify it temporarily. Furthermore there can be no question of genuine peace treaties with these nations; only truces, whose duration ought not, in principle, to exceed ten years, are authorised. But even such truces are precarious, inasmuch as they can, before they expire, be repudiated unilaterally should it appear more profitable for Islam to resume the conflict.”
This latter concept of obligatory jihad is best expressed by Islam’s dichotomized worldview that pits Dar al Islam (the Islamic world), against Dar al Harb (the non-Islamic world) until the former subsumes the latter. Internationally renowned Muslim historian and philosopher, Ibn Khaldun (d.1406), articulates this division thusly:
“In the Muslim community, holy war [jihad] is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense... But Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations.”
This concept is highlighted by the fact that, based on the ten year treaty of Hudaibiya, ratified between Muhammad and his Quraish opponents in Mecca, ten years is, theoretically, the maximum amount of time Muslims can be at peace with infidels. Based on Muhammad’s example of breaking the treaty after two years, (by citing a Quraish infraction), the sole function of the “peace-treaty” (hudna) is to buy weakened Muslims time to regroup before going on the offensive once more. Incidentally, Muhammad is quoted in the Hadith saying, “If I take an oath and later find something else better, I do what is better and break my oath.”
Is this what former PLO leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner, Yasser Arafat meant when, after negotiating a peace treaty criticized by Muslims as conceding too much to Israel, said in a mosque, “I see this agreement as being no more than the agreement signed between our Prophet Muhammad and the Quraish in Mecca”? What of Hamas, who on several occasions has made it clear that its ultimate aspiration is to see Israel destroyed. Under what context would it want to initiate a “temporary” peace with the Jewish state? When Osama bin Laden offered the U.S. a truce, stressing that “We [Muslims] are a people that Allah has forbidden from double-crossing and lying,” what was his ultimate intention? These are all clear instances of Muslims feigning friendliness simply in order to buy time to strengthen.
Most recently, a new Islamic group associated with Hamas called Jaysh al-Umma (Islam’s army), stated clearly, “Muslims all over the world are obliged to fight the Israelis and the infidels until only Islam rules the earth.” Realizing their slip, they quickly “clarified”: “We say that the world will not live in peace as long as the blood of Muslims continues to be shed.” Which is it—until Muslim blood stops being shed in Israel or “until only Islam rules the earth”?
Here, then, is the problem. If a) Islam must be in a constant state of war with the non-Muslim world—which need not be physical, as the ulema have classified several non-literal forms of jihad, such as “jihad-of-the-pen” (propaganda), and “money-jihad” (economic)—and b) If Muslims are permitted to lie and feign loyalty to the infidel, simply to further their war efforts—what does one make of any Muslim overtures of peace, tolerance, or dialogue?
RECIPROCAL TREATMENT OR RELIGIOUS OBLIGATION?
Why did Osama bin Laden, who firmly believes in the division of the world into two entities—Islam and the rest—which must war until the former dominates the globe, attack the U.S.? The following anecdote sheds some light: after a group of prominent Muslims wrote a letter to Americans saying that Islam is a peaceful religion that wishes to co-exist with others, seeking only to “live and let live,” Bin Laden castigated them as follows:
“As to the relationship between Muslims and infidels, this is summarized by the Most High's Word: ‘We renounce you. Enmity and hate shall forever reign between us — till you believe in Allah alone’ [Koran 60:4]. So there is an enmity, evidenced by fierce hostility from the heart. And this fierce hostility — that is, battle — ceases only if the infidel submits to the authority of Islam, or if his blood is forbidden from being shed [i.e., a dhimmi], or if Muslims are at that point in time weak and incapable [i.e., taqiyya]. But if the hate at any time extinguishes from the heart, this is great apostasy! … Such, then, is the basis and foundation of the relationship between the infidel and the Muslim. Battle, animosity, and hatred — directed from the Muslim to the infidel — is the foundation of our religion. And we consider this a justice and kindness to them” (from The Al Qaeda Reader).
It bears repeating that this hostile world view is well supported by all of Islam’s schools of jurisprudence. When addressing Western audiences, however, bin Laden’s tone drastically changes; he lists any number of “grievances” for fighting the West—from Palestinian oppression, to the Western exploitation of women and U.S. failure to sign the Kyoto protocol—never once alluding to fighting the U.S. simply because it is an infidel entity that must be subjugated. Indeed, he often initiates his messages to the West by saying “Reciprocal treatment is part of justice.”
This is of course a clear instance of taqiyya, as bin Laden is not only waging a physical jihad, but one of propaganda. Convincing a naïve West that the current conflict is entirely its fault only garners him and his cause more sympathy; conversely, he also knows that if Americans were to realize that, all political grievances aside—real or imagined—according to Islam’s worldview, nothing short of their submission to Islam can ever bring peace, his propaganda campaign would be quickly compromised. Hence the constant lying: “war is deceit.”
It should be added that, though the vast majority of the world’s Muslims are not terrorists, bin Laden’s list of grievances against the West is paradigmatic of the average Muslim’s grievances. However, if they are unaware that, according to Islam—not bin Laden—animosity towards infidels transcends time, space, and grievances, and that religious obligation commands the war continue till “all religion belongs to Allah,” they are either ignorant of their own faith (which is common) or—taqiyya?
WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE…
Associated with Hamas, denounced by American politicians for “pursuing an extreme Islamist political agenda,” its members arrested for terrorism-related charges—CAIR is another Muslim group which appears to be less than sincere to its non-Muslim audience; situated in the U.S. it is also much closer to home. When it comes to the issue of jihad, perpetual warfare, even doctrines such as taqiyya—indeed, all that has been delineated in this essay—CAIR has been at the forefront of, not only denying their existence, but accusing anyone alluding to them as an “Islamophobe,” thereby censoring any critical talk of Islam.
Could CAIR be taking lessons from the Muslim convert Masud who Muhammad urged to go and live among the Confederate infidels, solely in order to mislead and betray them, that Islam might triumph?
The most obvious example of taqiyya, however, comes ironically from an entire nation: Saudi Arabia. If any nation closely follows sharia—including the division of the world into two warring camps, Islam and Infidelity—it is Saudi Arabia, AKA, America’s “friend.” According to sharia, for instance, the Saudis will not allow the construction of a single church or synagogue on their land; Bibles are banned and burned. Christians engaged in any kind of missionary activity are arrested, tortured, and sometimes killed. Muslim converts to Christianity are put to death. A Filipino migrant worker named Lorenzo was imprisoned and tortured for six years. His crime? Wearing a cross.
Yet for all that, the Saudis have been pushing for more “dialogue” between Muslims and non-Muslims, trying to portray Islam as a tolerant religion that, once again, merely seeks to “coexist” with others. Rather tellingly, Saudi Arabia has not offered to host any of these conferences. Do they fear that a real “debate” might take place, once the non-Muslim participants discover that they are not free to practice their faiths on Saudi soil? The most recent inter-faith conference was held in Madrid, where King Abdullah, despite all the aforementioned, asserted, “Islam is a religion of moderation and tolerance, a message that calls for constructive dialogue among followers of all religions.”
Mere days later, it was revealed that Saudi children textbooks still call Christians and Jews “infidels,” the “hated enemies,” and “pigs and swine.” A multiple choice test in a fourth-grade book asks Muslim children, “Who is a ‘true’ Muslim?” The correct answer is not merely a man who prays, fasts, etc., but rather, “A man worships God alone, loves the believers, and hates the infidels”—that is, those same people the Saudis want to “dialogue” with.
Clearly, then, when Saudis—or other Muslims adhering to sharia—call for “dialogue” they are merely following Abu Darda’s advice: “Let us smile to the face of some people while our hearts curse them.”
IMPLICATIONS
There is also a philosophical – more particularly, epistemological – problem with taqiyya. Anyone who truly believes that no less an authority than God justifies and, through his prophet’s example, sometimes even encourages deception, will not experience any ethical qualms or dilemmas about lying. This is especially true if the human mind is indeed a tabula rasa shaped by environment and education. Deception becomes second nature.
Consider the case of former Al-Qaeda operative, Ali Mohammad. Despite being entrenched in the highest echelons of the terrorism network, Mohammed’s confidence at dissembling enabled him to become a CIA agent and FBI informant for years. People who knew him regarded him “with fear and awe for his incredible self-confidence, his inability to be intimidated, absolute ruthless determination to destroy the enemies of Islam, and his zealous belief in the tenets of militant Islamic fundamentalism”, according to Steven Emerson.
Indeed, this sentiment sums it all up: for a zealous belief in Islam’s tenets, which, as has been described above, legitimizes deception, will certainly go a long way in creating incredible self-confidence when deceiving one’s enemies.
CONCLUSION
All of the above is an exposition on Islamic practice and doctrine according to the Koran and example of Mohammad. Just as not every "Christian" understands or follows the teachings of Christ, so not every Muslim understands or follows the Koran. But if a man does understand Christ, he will not lie, he will love. And if a man truly understands Mohammad and the Koran, he is obligated to dissemble, dissimulate and lie for Mohammad split the world into two perpetually warring halves, and a moderate Muslim will always have a “divinely sanctioned” right and obligation to deceive, until “all chaos ceases, and all religion belongs to Allah” (Koran 8:39).
It goes without saying: They cannot admit this to the unbelieving kafir, dhimmi and infidel.
The following are purported to be facts. If you suspect any of the news stories to be misreported, please indicate the nature of the error.
Where Islam becomes the predominate religion this is the short list of things one sees:
Girls as young as 6 years old are forced into sex with "Husbands" Google (Mohammad and Aisha)
Polygamy legalized
Temporary marriages legal to avoid sexual sin
Instant divorce with no consideration for divorced women who are forced into poverty and underground prostitution until they are hanged, stoned or beheaded
These and the other fruits of Islam seem to manifest when Muslim populations exceed 5% according to the CIA World Fact Book.
Since the Q'uran alleges to be a preexistent eternal book always at Allah's side, perfect in every way and without a single flaw and since the 2nd tenant of Islam is that Mohammad is the perfect human in every way and that the goal of Islam is to consumately emulate Mohammad, and since Mohammad was a brutal killer by all accounts, it's impossible to say one is a true Muslim unless one condones at a minimum and ideally practices all that Mohammad practiced and taught in the Koran, Hadith and Sunnah. Ergo a Muslim who does not believe in war, violent Jihad, or believes in true friendship with kafirs and infidels, is not a true Muslim according to the Koran and Mohammad as explained and referenced in this video.
If Islam is scrutinized beyond the political spin, one will see that the higher the density of Muslims practicing the religion as Mohammad lived and taught, the more dense are the crimes against humanity. The support for this statement is not subtle or hidden: Examine the societies of Islam controlled countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, The Maldives, India, the Sudan, Algeria, New York, Israel, Russia, Chechnya, the Philippines, Indonesia, Nigeria, England, Thailand, Spain, Egypt, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Turkey, Morocco, Yemen, Lebanon, France, Uzbekistan, Gaza, Tunisia, Kosovo, Bosnia, Mauritania, Kenya, Eritrea, Syria, Somalia, Kuwait, Ethiopia, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Louisiana, Texas, Tanzania, Germany, Australia, Pennsylvania, Belgium, Denmark ,East Timor, Qatar, Maryl, Tajikistan, the Netherlands, Scotland, Chad, Canada, China, Nepal, the Maldives, Argentina, Angola and Iraq... and you will find the worst human rights abuses on the planet.
In Iraq and Iran the women are often "honor raped" before being put to death to preclude them from entering Heaven thus restoring honor to the family. Saudi Arabia exports its clerics all over the world to do Wahabi missionary work but Bibles and non-Muslim religious symbols are confiscated from tourists at the airport upon arrival and those caught preaching Jesus are imprisoned and in Afghanistan Iraq, Iran and other Islamic countries, apostates to Islam are hung until dead in a public celebration where teenagers rejoice if they can be the one to carry home the hands that are cut off from the bodies.
Mohammad taught that murder was less egregious than not believing Mohammad and that's why Abdul Rahman, 41, a medical aid worker who converted from Islam to Christianity, was sentenced to death after living in America and being a Christian for 16 years, when he returned to Afghanistan for a civil custody case between him and his wife where local Afghan authorities charged him with rejecting Islam, a capital crime under the country's Shar'ia-based law. The penalty, if guilty, is death.
Abdul Rahman was found guilty and given a death sentence. His story is not unique.
In the United States where Muslims have not yet taken control and only occasionally blow up skyscrapers in our cities, Islam is whitewashed and given honor and respect it does not deserve instead of being rightly and appropriately categorized as a lie responsible for arguably more bloodshed than any other lie. People are afraid to be caught on the wrong side of Politically Correct viewpoints which insist that every religion is true.
Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Matthew 7:15-18
For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, masquerading as apostles of Christ. 14 And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. 15 It is not surprising, then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. 2 Corinthians 11:15
For the Christian it's worth noting that Islam denies that Jesus rose from the dead and is the Only begotten Son of God. There is no more obvious or greater enemy of the gospel (The crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ) than Islam. If you doubt ask any knowledgeable dedicated Muslim if Jesus was God's literal Son, crucified, only to arise from the dead. This is a way to test Islam that is easy for anyone.
Of course Islam is presented as a religion of peace and righteousness in sheep's clothing. If the Devil were to create a religion in direct opposition to Christ, would he have it any other way?
Didn't Moses, Isaiah, Jesus and Paul warn that false prophets would come in sheep's clothing? But when Muslim behaviors are examined worldwide, and especially in full blown Islamic societies, what do you see? As Jesus said, "You will know a tree by it's fruit."
The Islamic Massacre at Beslan
It is hard to imagine that these children were raped in the middle of their gymnasium while they watched their friends and siblings being killed when Muslims obeying Mohammad's command and example stole their childhood over the course of three days as they were held hostage at their grade school in Beslan. The tragedy has marked them for the rest of their lives and most of them lost a sibling.
"I was in school that day, just like my sister who was killed. I will remember that day as long as I live and I will never forget it." 12-year-old Plieva Zalina recalled that fateful day four years ago when terrorists occupied the Beslan primary school, taking the teachers and pupils for hostages and keeping them there for several days without any food or water. In that cruel act, the terrorists killed 331 persons, of which 186 were children, while over 700 were injured.
Third grade pupil Victoria`s sister was killed by terrorists. She says she does not want to remember anything because it is very painful. Seeing how remembering those three days is a traumatic experience, we got back to brighter subjects and asked them what they thought of the Adriatic Sea and the Croatian capital.
The Beslan Grade School Girls Raped in the Name of Allah Do not read this if you are Squeamish
From the days of Prophet Muhammad, sexual terror has been an integral part of Islamic Jihad. The siege of the Beslan School by Islamic Jihadis in 2004 was no exception as reveals Dr. Schurman-Kauflin. -- Editor, MA Khan
Excerpt from Chapter 1, Disturbed: Terrorist Behavioral Profiles (2008)
On September 1, 2004, terrorists stormed a school in Beslan, Russia, and perpetrated one of the most heinous terror attacks in history. Though many people may have heard of this attack, it is very likely that most do not know what really happened there. The reality is so dark that few dare speak of what went on.
There are predators in wait lurking everywhere searching for unsuspecting victims. If a person has a proclivity or a secret desire, that inclination can easily come out if an opportunity arises. And that is what happened at Beslan. The terrorists immediately killed the men because they wanted no resistance for their plans. Then, when they saw the helpless girls in front of them, the temptation became too much. Their perverse dreams came true.
Beslan was clearly a sexual homicide/sexual suicide. That is, the offenders wanted more than simple terrorism. Some of the terrorists at Beslan were hired guns who did not plan on dying that day. They had not thought things through and did not realize that the Russians would not let them out alive.
Then, once they were inside, and the realization dawned on them, plans changed.
Things had deteriorated when the media reported that there were only 354 victims. Wanting to have a dramatic impact, the terrorists exploded with anger. There were 1200 victims, and the Russians were trying to down play the incident. The terrorists said they would have to eliminate victims to fit with what the media had reported. Their demeanor worsened, and they got really mean.
It was then that they began raping the girls. They wanted sex as they killed, and this is sexual homicide. A sex killer gets excited when he thinks about forcing himself inside an unwilling victim, but the rape itself does not produce the ultimate excitement. It is the rape followed by the killing that is arousing. This is what happened at Beslan.
One by one, females were targeted. The sex killers looked for the perfect victims, and after zeroing in, they grabbed and disrobed the little girls in the middle of the gym. There were muffled cries as the girls were humiliated in front of everyone. They were stripped, raped, and sodomized by several men. Not content to simply rape, the terrorists used their guns and other objects to penetrate the screaming victims while the other hostages were forced to watch. And the terrorists laughed. They laughed as they violated the children and made them bleed. What few people know is that some of the girls died as a result of being raped with objects. The internal damage was so severe that without immediate medical attention, the girls bled to death. Those who managed to survive required extensive reconstructive surgery and painful recoveries.
But raping the girls was not enough for the deviants who had entered the school. The terrorists beat the other children. In fact, beatings took place regularly, and as they pummeled the little ones, the terrorists smiled and laughed. It was said that they would strike a child and then watch the child cringe. When the youngsters recoiled, their captors laughed. This says the offenders enjoyed inflicting the suffering. They wanted their victims to suffer. Such behavior is sadistic. Bringing others pain brings the sadist pleasure. And the terrorists tortured the victims in many ways.
Along with causing paralyzing fear, the terrorists had an ally in the weather. It was extremely hot outside, but the school had no working air conditioner. As the heat raged, the hostages begged for water, and at first, some was given. Time crept on, and the terrorists became increasingly cruel. They drank in front of the hostages and mocked the children who were crying out for water. Things got so bad that the victims were forced to drink their own urine. In some cases, the hostages poured urine over one another in a feeble attempt to keep cool. Seeing the suffering enhanced the joy of the perpetrators. In a twisted, ghoulish game, the terrorists put water in front of the children who were desperately thirsty and told them if they reached for the water, they would be killed.
Still, this horror wasnt enough for the hostage takers. Raping, beating, torturing, and mocking were just not evil enough. Thus, to further frighten the victims, one terrorist stated we came here to die. Russian Tagirovich Khuchbarov was called the colonel. When the children asked for water or to use the restroom, he simply stated Im not your uncle, Im a terrorist I came here to kill." Up until this point, the hostages most likely believed they could survive, but thenhearing these wordsit meant they were to die too. This surely would have made the victims scream in their minds. If they cried out loud, they risked being beaten or shot.
As a crowd gathered outside the school, several terrorists goaded the townspeople. It was said that they took delight in egging the crowd on. They fired shots. They taunted. And again, they laughed. This psychopathic, sadistic behavior continued into the night as they ordered hostages to throw naked dead bodies out to the west yard. Yet, the Russian government did not want to negotiate with these offenders. Russian officials knew what they were dealing with: men intent on murder. However, in any hostage event, negotiations are necessary, but negotiations at Beslan were very difficult. When offered food, the terrorists refused because they feared poisoning. They had learned from Nord Ost and other terrorist standoffs. They would not make the same mistakes at Beslan.
Knowing that the elite Alpha and Vympel (Russia Special forces) would be called, the terrorists made it clear that if gas was used or electricity shut off, they would kill hostages immediately. The offenders had studied prior attacks and Russian counteroffensive techniques. So, they knew that Russia would stop at nothing to end the siege. With this knowledge, the terrorists had brought amphetamines with them to help stave off fatigue. This made them more wild and unpredictable. At one point, the terrorists allowed some hostages to leave. They told some mothers that they could get out with their babies and leave behind an older child or stay with both children. Those who left a child behind will certainly be tormented for the rest of their lives. At least one child who had been left behind survived the ordeal. One can only imagine that she could develop feelings of anger and maybe even hatred for the parent who abandoned her with psychopathic sexual sadists.
Russian Special Forces stormed the school using various techniques. Tanks were fired. Guns were fired. There were explosions. Alpha and Vympel members risked their lives to go into the school to save the children. In the end, nothing but bloodshed was achieved that day at Beslan. There were 330 people who died. Of those, 186 were the children. Blame has been tossed back and forth between the Russian government and the terrorists.
Critics have argued that evidence points to the fact that several of the terror attackers had been in Russian police custody prior to the attack. There were questions as to how these people managed to get out of jail to commit the atrocity, casting suspicion on the government itself. Conspiracy theories follow most big terror attacks. But there is no doubt that hostilities between the terrorists and the Russian government were not quieted. In fact, due to the horrific ending, anger has grown. In the end, this wretched act accomplished nothing but mass murder.
Beslan: They knifed babies, they raped girls
Details emerging from Beslan make it worse and worse. From the Sunday Mirror, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm and Sparta:
THE full horror of the Russian school atrocity began to emerge yesterday as traumatised children told horrific tales of stabbed babies and brutal rapes.
It has also emerged that scores of the 323 who died - including many children - had been shot in the back.
While despairing soldiers and rescue workers moved among the growing pile of body bags, it was revealed that an 18-month-old baby had been repeatedly stabbed by a black-clad terrorist who had run out of ammunition.
Other survivors told how screaming teenage girls were dragged into rooms adjoining the gymnasium where they were being held and raped by their Chechen captors who chillingly made a video film of their appalling exploits
They said children were forced to drink their own urine and eat the petals off the flowers they had brought their teachers after nearly three days without food or water in the stifling hot gym.
Their stories came as Russian officials warned that the final death toll of the siege of Middle School No 1 at Beslan in North Ossetia - in which up to 1,200 people were held captive - was likely to be more than 400.
The official toll yesterday stood at 323 which included 156 children, 10 Russian soldiers and two emergency service workers - 35 of the hostage-takers were also killed. Last night 434 people were being treated in hospital with 247 children and 85 adults in a critical condition.
A Russian official said six seriously injured children had been taken to Moscow for treatment.
"One of them is a child, just 18 months old, with many knife wounds," he said.
The Chechen terrorists - including two so-called "Black Widows" - had been meticulously planning the hostage-taking for months.
God never told Mohammad to teach or kill anyone. Mohammad never exhibited a SINGLE MIRACLE or sign showing that Almighty God had selected him as a Prophet. Quite notable when you realize he claims to follow the same God that gave every other prophet indisputable signs such as raising the dead, healing the blind, parting the Red Sea, walking on water, etc, etc. Modern people are deceived into thinking that anyone who says he has a message from God is telling the truth and that every religion is equally valid. Looking at the information and pictures below, do you really think this comes from Jesus and his Father?
Happy Muslims doing EXACTLY as Mohammad did and taught. These could EASILY be pictures of Mohammad himself.
Do you think Muslims want to be photographed doing evil? For every horrific act caught on camera, how many horrifc acts do you think go un-reported?
The man you see above begging for his life is a Hindu who had the misfortune of walking past a mosque in Bangladesh as its congregation was leaving after Friday prayers. Vimal Patak was beaten to death in the name of Islam as an imam watched. This could soon happen again in a neighborhood near you.
Could this young man, a product of Islam, be any Happier? Do you see anything wrong with a religion that inspires this?
This is what a SON OF MOHAMMAD looks like.
Truthful but Politically Incorrect Sites on Measurable Horrific Islamic Effects on the World
My best friend Sean, a brilliant laywer and truly funny human, thinks fact finding about Islam is unkind, that we should ignore the facts and proclaim Islam means Peace and that Jesus and Mohammad are virtually twins. Perhaps it's because he doesn't know the facts about Mohammad and how early on Mohammad wiped out 60 million Christians, 80 million Hindus and all the dogs in town on a regular basis because he thought Angels didn't like dogs. Just read on if you want to know Islam that is consistant with Mohammad's biography. I wonder if my friend Sean even knows that the word "Islam" means SUBMIT. For a very quick Graphic Comic Book read of quite peculiar things Mohammad said and did, check out this link for the PDF islamic_comic_book.pdf
Things to know for some of the articles:
Q'uran/Koran comprises two books: Koran of Mecca (Islam small, weak, few followers, oddly Mohammad was humble, less Jihad, more talk of peace) and the Koran of Medina (Islam much larger, power to kill enemies, oddly, Mohammad suddenly advocates Jihad against all unbelievers)
Mohammad returns to Mecca destroys all art and kills all who openly oppose him, artists, poets, intellectuals.
Excellent Political and Statistical summary of the Center for Study of Political Islam's analysis of the Trilogy of Islamic sacred texts - Quran, Surah, Hadiths
Just a very good read.
Excerpt:
Warner: First, lets see how ignorant we are about the history of political Islam. How many Christians can tell you how Turkey or Egypt became Islamic? What happened to the Seven Churches of Asia mentioned in Pauls letters? Find a Jew who can tell you the Jewish history of dhimmitude (second class citizens who serve Islam). What European knows that white women were the highest priced slaves in Mecca? Everyone knows how many Jews Hitler killed, but find an unbeliever who can tell you how many died in jihad over the last 1400 years.
We are just as ignorant about the doctrine of Islam. An FBI agent gets two hours of training on Islam and most of that is how not to offend the imam. We are fighting in Iraq. Who utilizes the political, military doctrine of Islam to plan strategy? Who can find a single rabbi or minister who has read the Koran, Sira and Hadith? What governor, senator, congressmen or military leader displays a knowledge of the political doctrine of Islam? Try to find a course available in a college about Islamic political doctrine and ethics. Graduates are schooled in Islamic art, architecture, poetry, Sufism, and a glorious history that ignores the suffering of the innocent unbelievers. Graduates read comments about the Koran and Hadith, but do not read the actual doctrine.
Gentle Islamic honor rape, garrot strangling, pretty 20 year old girl who fell in love with an unapproved man stuffed in a suitcase. Her badly decomposed body was found 3 months later. The gentle family of men, ages 52, 51 and 30 were found guilty of murder after a 3 month trial.
The honoring (raping, garotting, beating) of this 20 year old woman by these 3 loving Islamic men was carried out at her home in London.
The frequency of these crimes in the Muslim community is much greater than in any other cultural association. Google "Islam rape" and then google "Christian rape" without the quotes. You see millions of hits complaining about rapes in the Islamic communities and beyond while Christians are in charge of victim support groups.
Excellent article on the Insidiously Evil way Islam deliberately misleads and cajoles stronger forces with talk of Peace until they are sufficiently buried in the host country's flesh to completely take over and force everyone to submit to Mohammad and Islam. The other two options have always been the same: Slavery or Death.
References in Islamic texts to Mohammad, aged 60, killing brothers, fathers and children of young mothers then taking these 17 year old widows and raping them. Bukhari:V5B59N512
Ishaq 595 "The Apostle said, Get him away from me and cut off his tongue.""
Ishaq:316 "Following Badr, Muhammad sent a number of raiders with orders to
capture some of the Meccans and burn them alive."
Sunan Abu -Dawud,4390
"Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair."
Ishaq:551 The Messenger ordered Miqyas' assassination because he became a renegade by rejecting Islam."
Bukhari:V4B52N260 "The Prophet said, If a Muslim discards his religion, kill him.'"
Honor killings are a horrific outgrowth of the misogyny encouraged by Islam, which includes wife beating, sharia discrimination, child marriages, wife rape, female genital mutilation, the rape of captured slaves and polygamy. The mainstream media will likely bury this story outside of England.
Self-immolation has long been the preferred method of suicide in Afghanistan, but "the trend is upward," says Ancil Adrian-Paul of the women's nonprofit Medica Mondiale. Girls as young as nine set themselves ablaze, typically with cooking oil. In Herat Province, where last year 90 women lit themselves on fire, Zahra spent 93 days in the burn unit. Her husband beat her regularly, told her she was worthless and should just light a match. So she did. She is, by some accounts, lucky: More than 70 percent of victims of self-immolation do not survive.
On the day of a young boy's circumcision, these girls don lipstick and their very best dresses. If the odds hold, only a couple of them will receive an education. Just one in five Afghan schools are designated as girls' schools; coed schools are banned. A third of Afghanistan's school districts have no girls' schools at all, and the schools that do exist are under constant threat of attack.
Afghanistan has more than 2 million widows, and these and other desperately poor women often turn to prostitution, despite the risk of being killed by their families if they are discovered. So they remain in the shadows, beneath a double veil of tradition and shame. This womans husband is too old to work. She sold her daughter into marriage before the girl was 10, and now she sells herself.
Remember, Afghanistan is 99% Islam
It should be a paradise since it's controlled by Islamic Law But what do we see instead? One might almost think this religion didn't come from Jesus, but from the Devil
Twenty-four-year-old Shaima Rezayee hosted a popular music show on Tolo TV. She was strong, independent, unmarried, and she refused to wear the burka. In 2005 her sister found her dead in her Kabul apartment, shot in the head. Rezayee's brothers were charged with her murder-a rarity, as few are ever prosecuted for honor killings.
Poem
This poem was originally written by a Jewish poet to describe Jewish failure to recognize Nazis before it was too late. It was modified by an Indian to describe the designs of Islamic terrorism in the Indian-subcontinent since 1947.
First they came for Punjabi / Sindhi / Bangladeshi non-Muslims
But I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Punjabi / Sindhi / Bangladeshi non-Muslim
Then they came for the Kashmiri non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Kashmiri non-Muslim
Then they came for the Jammu / Ladakhi non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Jammu / Ladakhi non-Muslim
Then they came for the Assamese non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Assamese non-Muslim
Then they came for the West Bengali non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a West Bengali non-Muslim
Then they came for the Nepali non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Nepali non-Muslim
Then they came for me,
And there was no one left to speak out for me.
By Dr. Peter Hammond FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, April 21, 2008
The following is adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat:
Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called 'religious rights.'
When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to 'the reasonable' Muslim demands for their 'religious rights,' they also get the other components under the table. Here's how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:
United States -- Muslim 1.0%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1%-2%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. ( United States ).
France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris --car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam - Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:
Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 99.9%
Of course, that's not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. Leon Uris, 'The Haj'
It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.
Payam Amini, who was hung in public on Sunday September 29, 2002 accused of rape and abduction, during the very last moments of his life. He remained defiant until the end.
He refused to wear the blindfold and shouted:
"...we didn't kill anyone, we don't deserve to die. So many terrible crimes are committed in this country every day and yet no one is punished for it.."
The Fate of Infidels and Apostates under Islam by Azam Kamguian
In a feeble attempt to disguise the Islamic attitude to apostasy, apologists often quote the Koranic verse: There shall be no compulsion in religion. For a Muslim wishing to leave Islam this is simply not true. In Yemen its punishable by death as it is in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan under the Taliban and other Islamic states.
The most famous incidence of Apostasy was in 1989 when Ayatollah Khomeini announced a fatwa, or death sentence against Salman Rushdie for his alleged apostasy in writing The Satanic Verses. In a similar vein in Iran in July 1998 a man was executed for allegedly converting a Muslim woman to the Bahai faith, this was even though the woman claimed that her mother was Bahai and that she was raised according to that faith. Freedom Houses Centre for Religious Freedom recently protested the forthcoming trial, before a Sharia court of Islamic law, of Hamid Pourmand, the 47 year old lay leader of a small Assemblies of God church in the southern port city of Bandar-i-Bushehr.
Pourmand, a convert from Islam, is facing charges of apostasy from Islam and proselytising Muslims, both capital offences in Iran. The government of Iran puts someone on trial for his life solely for his religious belief. The states criminalisation of apostasy is always subject to political manipulation and indicates an absolute negation of individual rights and freedom. Iran applies an extremist interpretation of Shiite Islamic law or Sharia, which harshly represses the free expression of belief, including religious conversion by Muslims.
Irans Sharia courts view non-Muslims as second-class citizens, whose testimony is given less weight than Muslims, and sometimes even as non-persons, without any legal protections.
Judged by the number of personal privileges that Mohammed granted himself, he was probably the most selfish leader in history. The following is only a small sample of those privileges:
Mohammed, through the Quran, granted himself the right to marry as many women as he wished but restricted the other Muslims to marry only four women. In addition Mohammed granted himself the right to have sex with women who offer themselves to him.
Mohammed granted himself the right to marry other Muslims widows but declared, through the Quran, that it is a sin for other Muslims to marry his own wives (after his death).
Mohammed declared that his shares from any war booty were 20%, the remaining 80% to be shared by the rest of the Muslims.
Mohammed considered himself to be the first among all human beings including the previous prophets. According to him, he was second only to Allah. As a matter of fact there was no difference between Islam and the other religions already practiced in Arabia except that in Islam Mohammed added his name next to Allahs name.
Mohammeds egocentricity extended to his immediate family, called aal Mohammed, for whom Muslims are required to pray in every Islamic prayer.
Monday, 13 August 2007
Iran authorities lash man for having bible in car - report
Tehran, Iran, Aug. 13 Iranian authorities in Tehran lashed a man on his back earlier this year for having a bible in his car, an Iranian Christian group said in a report on its website on Friday.
The man was only identified by the initials A. Sh.
On 5 May, the man, driving his vehicle, was involved in a road accident with a car belonging to security guards for a government official in Tehran.
A bible and a video of Jesus Christ were found in the man's possession upon inspection of his vehicle by the state security forces (SSF).
A. Sh. admitted to being Christian, prompting the security agents to beat him up, the report said. He was arrested and taken to a holding cell in Detention Centre 102.
During interrogation s
ecurity agents accused the man of converting from Islam to Christianity, a practice banned under Iran's strict theocratic laws.
He was subsequently subjected to lashes on the back and underwent physical and psychological torture, the report added.
He was released two days later after his family made bail.
Sun. 14 Oct 2007
London - Islam Orders Christian Couple Flogged for Going to Church
A Christian couple were flogged in Iran for participating in an underground Church, an Iranian Christian group said in a report on its website earlier this week.
The unnamed couple were arrested on September 21, 2005, the report said, adding that a Revolutionary Court reviewed their case in July 2007.
Even though the couple had decided to marry seven years ago, the countrys marriage laws - which prohibit the union of ex-Muslims and members of other religious minorities prevented them from obtaining a certificate of marriage.
The report said that the woman was born a Christian in an Assyrian-Iranian family and the man was a convert to Christianity prior to getting married.
The court ruled that both the man and the woman were Mortad, a description of someone who has committed apostasy by leaving Islam.
15 year old girl with cute chubby cheeks caught with active bomb belt just before she blew herself and a bunch of children to Allah - the God of Peace and Love, and Mohammad, his Prophet, whom Muslims say is superior to Jesus. Long live Mohammad. May his heavenly bean bag be filled with the heads of his enemies he slaughtered.
In the city of Mashhad in north-eastern Iran, two gay teens have been executed. One was 18 and the other is thought to have been 16 or 17. First they were lashed 228 times, though. Not long after the execution there were howls of outrage from the Iranian parliament - not at the execution itself, but at the temerity of journalists to report it.
Consensual gay sex in any form is punishable by death in the Islamic Republic of Iran. According to the website Age of Consent, which monitors such laws around the world, in Iran Homosexuality is illegal, those charged with love-making Irangay_teens_2 are given a choice of four deathstyles: being hanged, stoned, halved by a sword, or dropped from the highest perch.
According to Article 152, if two men not related by blood are discovered naked under one cover without good reason, both will be punished at a judges discretion. Gay teens (Article 144) are also punished at a judges discretion. Rubbing ones penis between the thighs without penetration (tafheed) shall be punished by 100 lashes for each offender. This act, known to the English-speaking world as frottage, is punishable by death if the offender is a non-Muslim. If frottage is thrice repeated and penalty-lashes have failed to stop such repetitions, upon the fourth offense both men will be put to death.
According to Article 156, a person who repents and confesses his gay behavior prior to his identification by four witnesses, may be pardoned. Even kissing with lust (Article 155) is forbidden. This bizarre law works to eliminate old Persian male-bonding customs, including common kissing and holding hands in public. And Outrage, in its release about the gay teens execution, noted that, according to Iranian human rights campaigners, over 4000 lesbians and gay men have been executed since the Ayatollahs seized power in 1979. Last August, a 16-year-old girl was hanged for acts incompatible with chastity.
According to Outrage:
They admitted to having gay sex (probably under torture) but claimed in their defence that most young boys had sex with each other and that they were not aware that homosexuality was punishable by death. Prior to their execution, the teenagers were held in prison for 14 months and severely beaten with 228 lashes. Their length of detention suggests that they committed the so-called offences more than a year earlier, when they were possibly around the age of 16.
Her Crime? Having an Affair!
Many brain washed Pasdar and Basij raped female prisoners. By law of Islamic Regime of Ayatollahs, a virgin girl, if executed, will be blessed into the heaven, so Muslims often rape women before executing them.
When Mohammed triumphantly entered Mecca, he first prayed, then he had all of the religious art destroyed. Next he ordered the killing of every single intellectual and artist in Mecca who had opposed Islam. When he died, he did not have a single opponent who would speak against Islam. Only 6% of the references to Hell in the Koran are for immorality such as theft, lies, murder and greed. 94% of references to Hell are for the intellectual sin of disagreeing with Mohammed. In the hierarchy of Islam, disagreeing with Mohammed is a worse sin than murder. When an intellectual or artist spoke against Islam, Mohammed sent an assassin to remove the offender. Such assassinations were defensive, since the artist had offended Allah. Humor about Islam was forbidden. One man was beheaded because of a pun and a joke. The Koran condemns private criticism of Islam. The world changes, but the doctrine of Islam is eternal and never changes. Just as in Mohammed's day, the media, politicians, universities, artists and writers know the danger of expressing an opinion against Islam. Every artist and intellectual knows the fear of Islam. Each paragraph of MOHAMMED, ALLAH, AND THE INTELLECTUALS is taken from the Trilogy texts of Sira, Hadith, and the Koran. This book is not about Islam; it is Islam. Become your own expert by learning about Islam from Mohammed and the Koran.
How did Mohammed treat contemporary poets who dared to opine against him and his techings? Simple, he had them killed! One was a women with five sons who was murdered in her tent at night while suckling her infant (Asma bint Marwan); another was an elderly Jew (Abu 'Afak) who was assasinated because he refused to convert to Islam and opposed Mohammed. This is where the Islamic tradition of anti-intellectual/anti-artist fatwas (death warrants) arose.
When Muslims -- clerics as well as "the street" -- all over the world called for the deaths of the people involved in drawing and publishing allegedly sacrilegious cartoons of Mohammed in a Danish newspaper, they had good religious authority for their call to murder. The Salmon Rushdie religious death warrant is yet another modern-day example of ayatollahs (Shi'ite Islamic holy men) merely following Mohammed's example.
Over a 1400 year period jihad destroyed half of Christianity.
MOHAMMED, ALLAH, AND THE CHRISTIANS gives the complete story of Mohammed and the Christians. The Koran ends with both political and theological dominance over Christianity. There is no Trinity, Jesus was a Muslim prophet, and Mohammed is the final prophet for Christians. Only those Christians who admit these Islamic facts are real Christians and therefore, brothers to Islam. In the beginning, Mohammed took a favorable view of Christians as brothers to Muslims. But after he crushed both the polytheists and the Jews, he turned his attention to making the Christians submit to Islam. Mohammed's last jihad was against the Christians in Syria. Then after Mohammed's death, Islam attacked and destroyed the Christianity of Egypt, North Africa, Syria, and Turkey. All of this was done in imitation of how Mohammed had treated the Christians in Arabia. Over a 1400 year period jihad destroyed half of Christianity. According to Islam it is the destiny of all Christians to become either Muslim or "dhimmis" (semi-slaves). MOHAMMED, ALLAH, AND THE CHRISTIANS is not about Islam, but is pure Islamic doctrine.
Since 9/11, Americans have become very interested in the teachings of Islam. Before our Age of Political Correctness and Cultural Relativism, Western scholars had a Golden Age of scholarship about Islam and Mohammed, which lasted from about 1870 to 1970, give or take a decade. Their conclusions, which were passed around a small community of fellow religious scholars and historians, are quite stark.
See for instance, this excerpt from the entry "Mohammed and Mohammedanism" in the 1910 CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA, available free online:
"In matters political Islam is a system of despotism at home and aggression abroad. The Prophet commanded absolute submission to the imm. In no case was the sword to be raised against him. The rights of non-Moslem subjects are of the vaguest and most limited kind, and a religious war is a sacred duty whenever there is a chance of success against the "Infidel". Medieval and modern Mohammedan, especially Turkish, persecutions of both Jews and Christians are perhaps the best illustration of this fanatical religious and political spirit."
The following hadith summarizes all the key elements of jihad.
B1,7,331 Mohammed: I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me:
1. Allah made me victorious by awe, by His frightening my enemies for a distance of one months journey.
2. The earth has been made for me and for my followers a place for praying and a place to perform rituals; therefore, anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
3. The spoils of war has been made lawful for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
4. I have been given the right of intercession on the Day of Resurrection.
5. Every prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
The story of the Trilogy culminates in the dominance of political Islam through jihad. The Trilogy teaches that Islam is the perfect political system and is destined to rule the entire world. The governments and constitutions of the world must all submit to political Islam. If the political systems of the unbelievers do not submit, then force (jihad) may be used. All jihad is defensive, since refusing to submit to Islam is an offense against Allah. All Muslims must support the political action of jihad. This may take several formsfighting, proselytizing or contributing money.
The Trilogy overflows with ethical statements such as these from Bukharis Hadith.)
B9,85,83 Mohammed: A Muslim is a brother to other Muslims. He should never oppress them nor should he facilitate their oppression.
B8,73,70 Mohammed: Harming a Muslim is an evil act; killing a Muslim means rejecting Allah.
B5,59,369 Mohammed asked, Who will kill Kab (a Jewish poet), the enemy of Allah and Mohammed?
Bin Maslama rose and responded, O Mohammed! Would it please you if I killed him?
Mohammed answered, Yes.
Bin Maslama then said, Give me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plot will succeed.
Mohammed replied, You may speak falsely to him.
A Muslim should be a brother to other Muslims (not the rest of humanity). A Muslim should not kill another Muslim. A Muslim may lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
So for Islam the ethical statements are:
Do not kill another Muslim.
Do not steal from another Muslim.
Do not deceive another Muslim.
Islam divides the entire world into Islam and nonbelievers and has two sets of ethics, one for Islam and another for the rest. The Golden Rule has the equality of all humanity as its basis. It is not: Do unto some people, as you would have them do unto you, but do unto all people as you would have them do unto you.
To reinforce their beheading skills and make them fearless, training is imparted in beheading running dogs. Trainers are asked to chase a running dog in motorbike and slash its tail or sever its head. Special training is provided to improve marksmanship by stabbing running dogs with a sharp dagger.
Muslims claim that Allah has given them power over animals and infidels and subdue them in the name of Allah. By slashing running dogs and beheading them as part of Jihad training, Muslims claim that they are serving Allah. The act symbolizes Jihadis willingness to kill non-believers in the name of Allah. In order to strengthen beheading skills and induce fearlessness as well as motivate them to stay on the straight path, and willingness to fight infidels, Jihadis claim that this cruel acts against dogs is necessary.
Islam believes in utilitarian morality. Muslims have moral obligations and duties between Muslims. Muslims consider animals and unbelievers are not susceptible of the moral obligations which they owe to fellow Muslims. Muslims do not necessarily acknowledge any right inherent in animals and unbelievers. Islam treat animals and unbelievers as means and they have no rights. In the plan of Allah, unbelievers and animals are subordinated to the service of Muslims.
This is a very inhumane act. Many dogs are slaughtered and injured in exceptionally inhuman ways. Dogs are often forced to endure repeated stabs or blows and they are pierced with swords as part of the training.
While Jihadi terrorism training camps continue to function, the Marxist government is not interested in shutting down the camps.The Marxist governments counter terrorism efforts have been very weak and ineffective.
Each time a terrorist incident occurs, the Marxist government provides more financial aid, grants for neighborhood improvement and innovative programs to improve self-esteem of Muslims. Marxist intellectuals and the media are afraid to address the root cause of terrorism that is Islam for fear of escalating further Islamic terrorism. Each time, the government is afraid to react strongly and decisively enough to put an end to Jihadi terrorism, it would further motivate Jihadis to commit terrorism. All that matters now is abandon the psychology of appeasement and defeat the jihadi terrorist with firm action.
Summary:
Mohammad's closest wife, Aisha, accused him ofpretending to be a prophetof Allah and Mohammad allowed his young wife Aisha to be punched in the mouthtill blood poured out on her clothes when she called Mohammad unjust. She didn't seem to be too impressed with him.
She also noticed that there seemed to be a strange relationship between Mohammad's desires and the decrees of Allah. No sooner did Mohammad desire something then Allah hastened to give a law that made it so, be it for war booty, which Mohammad said was unlawful for all others but that Allah made it lawful for him only, and those to whom he gave it. Or about marrying Aisha, his brother's daughter, the dialog is well known and clear - it was unlawful, but Allah gave him a revelation that it was okay for Mohammad.
Notice also how Aisha knew that the Lord of Abraham was a different and more powerful God and she would taunt Mohammad with this. She knew that invoking this Jewish God's name was very different and upsetting to the Prophet of Allah - pubah.
Finally, here is how God treated past prophets:
Genesis 47:9 And Jacob said to Pharaoh, "The years of my pilgrimage are a hundred and thirty. My years have been few and difficult.
Abraham wasn't even allowed to step foot into the promise land but lived in tents in the desert. John the baptist ate locusts and wore camel's hair and Jesus said if people wanted to see finery they should go to a palace. Jesus himself never owned a house but said he had no place to lay his head.
But Mohammad - so much war booty!!! What a wealthy indulgent man :-) And he shared it with any who fought for him. Then Islam grew, even though before war booty and Jihad, he preaced for 13 years and garnered very few followers - only 150.
After one month the Prophet deserted his wives and conveniently Allah immediately issues a decree allowing this: "You may defer any one of them you wish and take to your self any you wish and there is no sin for you to take back any of them you have (temporarily) set aside. (33:51)" When Mohammad revealed this word of Allah which was so convenient to his carnal desires, Aishanoticed and saidto the Prophet:
"It seems to me that your Lord hastens to satisfy your desire!"
Sunni references:
Sahih Muslim, English version, Chapter DLXXII (titled: Permissibility of bestowing the turn on one's fellow wife), v2, pp 748-749, Traditions #3453-3454
Sahih Muslim, Arabic version, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, v2, pp 1085-1086, Traditions #49-50
One day, in the presence of her father, she started a quarrel with the Prophet and told him: "Be just." Her father punished her for the impudence by giving a powerful a slap on her face so that she bled profusely and the blood ran onto her clothes.
Sunni references:
Kanz al-Ummal, by al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, v7, p116, Tradition #1020
Ihyaa al-Ulum, by al-Ghazzali, Chapter 3, Bab al-Nikah, v2, p35
Mukashifat al-Qulub, by al-Ghazzali, Chapter 94, p238
If Aisha got angry at the Prophet - which she did quite often - she would avoid uttering the name of the Prophet (PBUH&HF). She would not mention the name of Muhammad, but rather used to say: "By the Lord of Abraham" (Sahih al-Bukhari, Arabic-English version, Tradition #7.155 and #8.101, The Chapter of Jealousy and Wiles of a woman).
Once she angrily said to the Messenger of Allah (PBUH&HF):
"It is you who pretend to be a prophet from Allah."
Sunni references:
- Ihyaa al-Ulum, by al-Ghazzali, Chapter 3, v2, p29, The Book on the Etiquettes of Marriage
- Mukashifat al-Qulub, by al-Ghazzali, Chapter 94
Subhana Allah!!! This is the Messenger of Allah, and submitting to his order is obligatory for every believing men and women. Disputing him is a sign of great impurity and the one who does that can not be regarded as pure and righteous since s/he has committed a grave sin, let alone casting doubt on the prophethood of Muhammad (PBUH&HF).
Hoo Boy: Mohammad Hated Dogs and thought God did too :-)
Hadeeth No. 3008, Narrated Salim's father
Once Gabriel promised the Prophet (that he would visit him, but Gabriel did not come) and later on he said, "We, angels, do not enter a house which contains a picture or a dog."
Hadeeth No. 3098, Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar. Allah's Apostle ordered that the dogs should be killed
Hadeeth No. 3100, Narrated Sufyan bin Abi Zuhair Ash-Shani, beware of keeping a dog as you might loose the benefit of all your good deedsT
he heard Allah's Apostle saying, "If somebody keeps a dog that is neither used for farm work nor for guarding the livestock, he will lose one Qirat (of the reward) of his good deeds everyday ( as long as he keeps the dog )
Sahih Muslim B24,5248, the puppy killer
When it was evening Gabriel met him and he said to him: you promised me that you would meet me the previous night. He said: Yes, but we do not enter a house in which there is a dog or a picture. Then on that very morning he commanded the killing of the dogs until he announced that the dog kept for the orchards should also be killed, but he spared the dog meant for the protection of extensive fields (or big gardens).
Book 010, Number 3813:
Abu Zubair heard Jabir b.'Abdullah (Allah be pleased with him) saying: Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) ordered us to kill dogs, and we carried out this order so much so that we also kill the dog coming with a woman from the desert. Then Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) forbade their killing. He (the Holy Prophet further) said: It is your duty the jet-black (dog) having two spots (on the eyes), for it is a devil.
Book 010, Number 3820:
Salim b. Abdullah reported on the authority of his father that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Whosover amongst the owners of the house keeps a dog other than one meant for watching the herd or for hunting loses two qirat of his deeds every day.
Do you ever feel the pain and pressure of trying to convey the mountain of
evidence of how GOOD and RIGHT Christ is to an unbeliever? That's how I feel discussing Mohammad and the terror, lies, bloodshed, oppression and death he himself committed and inspired for 1400
years. In showing someone an ocean, the hard part is...where to begin and even if they hear the truth, will modern political correctness whitewash it, just as people refused to believe Jesus was the Son of God, even crucifying him though he did not commit a single sin?
The video I wanted to show you was so disturbing they were forced to
take it off youtube. Much of what Islam inspires is too horrible to
mention and certainly to see: So many men and women's heads slowly cut
off with hunting knives on video.
I have spared you the more grisly scenes. I saw women holding hands
as they jumped, I saw one man whose torso was oddly intact on the
ground, but his legs were like a cartoon, so flat and wide with his
muscles liquefied along with his bones and blood. They took it off
youtube because it was too graphic. Much of what we know about
Islam is cleaned up by our western media.
I have seen women shot in the head, many men hung, American
tourists' heads chopped off slowly with a knife - heard them screaming.
Even if we had 30 days of continuous time, I could not do justice to
all the murders and heinous things Islam has inspired in just the last
year, much less in it's 1400 years.
I never know where to begin - for the parts can only be understood
by the whole and is it possible I'm fighting the Devil, political
correctness and the tendency for liberals to deny that any religion is
evil but an inclination to act is if they all come from God or at least
are mostly benign but certainly all equally "valid?"
2.) Islam has killed more people than any war, religion, individual
or movement in the last 1400 years and there is a steady flowing river
of blood, burnt bodies, honor rapes, honor burnings, de-handings, death
beatings, dog beheadings (practice for Jihad) and human beheadings in
the name of Allah and there always has been from the beginning of his
religion. Mohammad knew how to slit a throat. We are not talking
fair fights in battle where a thousand warriors surrounded King David -
we are talking about men begging for mercy on their knees, women poets
nursing their babies surrounded by 5 children ad infinitum.
3.) http://prophetofdoom.net/
They have gone to A LOT of trouble to present factual
information. All of this info could be ignored under some pretense I
suppose.
But even if we pretend none of that is true and wipe the slate clean
and put Islam on par with Christianity, also ignoring the people
murdered in Mumbai Indiana only hours ago by gentle Muslims and the
daily reports of how they get young girls and boys to strap on suicide
bombs and blow up civilians and the 11 year old girls who are burned
for wearing lip stick and the 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 year olds who are
constantly put in the hellish situation of marrying their 50 year old
relatives and being treated as sex slaves to wrinkly old smelly men
whom Mohammad said they could beat(google it), many commit suicide,
Aiesha's hair fell out and she got deathly sick when she learned she
would be sleeping with a big hairy 50 year old murderer booty grubbing
warlord who intimidated her Father, but don't take my word for it:
Ask Time Magazine's most influential Dr. Wafa Sultan:
A Muslim Woman for 3 decades, now a Psychiatrist and called by Time
Magazine one of the 10 most influential people in the world. She may
know something about Islam:
I have no doubt there is much talk of peace in the Koran. However, a
fly in the ointment ruins the whole batch, one genetic mutation = a
baby with flipper arms, and just 1 out of 12 apostles who isn't true
results in a blood bath. If these are true, does just a little
murder, rape, and ruination of 6 year old girl's lives outweigh a
smidgeon of peace talk? Do we judge serial killers by their
peaceful calm moments (THERE ARE MANY IN EVERY MURDERER'S LIFE) or by
the killings?
Why don't the trials focus on the years of quiet family times?
But one can never describe the evil deeds of Islam in just one
lifetime. I would have to give up my life to cover that evil life, not
including hundreds of generations of the same.
I would not expect Satan's story in the Garden of Eden to be 100%
lie. In fact it would be glorious and inspiring if set to Chariots of
Fire music: A religious talk about God, about life, about how to gain
knowledge and be like God, and there will be no death, only gain.
Camera pans in on just how good the fruit looked, and the smile on
Eve's face as she contemplated having her blind eyes "opened" to see
like God! Music swells.
This is the oldest trick in the book. So if much of the Koran talks
of good virtues, so did Jim Jones, David Koresh and Marshall
Applewhite.
Evil works best when it's 99% subterfuge; all the better to hide the 1% that brings death.
I'm not convinced that the evil that Mohammad has brought to the
earth is trivial or insignificant. Is 200 million slaughtered and
counting trivial?
Mohammad helps me understand what it means to hunger and thirst for
justice and righteousness. Mohammad makes Hitler look like Florence
Nightingale.
But let's, for the sake of political correctness, say that Mohammad
never did anything wrong, but was, because he claimed to have a message
from God, a good gentle and loving man. Let's say that.
The man you see above begging for his life is a
Hindu who had the misfortune of walking past a mosque in Bangladesh as
its congregation was leaving after Friday prayers. Vimal Patak was
beaten to death in the name of Islam as an imam watched. This could
soon happen again in a neighborhood near you.
Even if we forget the river of constantly flowing blood, let's say I
spare you of information about the Ayatollah Khomeini and his Sharia laws
making provisions for sex with babies and animals documented in a
library of congress book...let's ignore all the great Islamic leaders
and their murderers, tortures and perversions, JUST IN OUR LIFETIMES,
not looking back more than 10 years....what if we asked just this then:
What was God's attitude towards idolaters, false prophets and any
religion not authorized by him? Why should God have a problem if
other entities or people wish to put words in his mouth, or work out
another ethical path or another prescription for salvation? Do you
think God knew in advance what the fruit of non-YHWH religions would be?
As one reads the Old and New Testaments, how much do you think YHWH,
the one characterized in the Bible, would approve or smile upon Islam,
even if it wasn't a factory that churned out people who will deny that
Jesus was the crucified, resurrected Son of God for their entire lives?
Even if it didn't say that Mohammad was the last and greatest
prophet, excelling even the "good man" Jesus, who was a very
respectable second to Mohammad, Peace Be Upon Him (PBUH)?
Do you think it was YHWH that told Mohammad, PBUH, to do and speak
as he did? Are you aware of just how much killing, over 1400
years has gone on in the name of Mohammad, PBUH?
If there were a Devil, the way many characters in the Bible seemed
to think, even Jesus seemed to consider this possible: could he
communicate, perhaps be articulate enough to create a teaching? If so,
would accompanying lies and murders be as plentiful as the sand on the
seashore and deceptively effective?
Are there any good liars on earth? If the Devil were inclined to
tell a lie, I'm not saying he would, but if he did and put people up to
the same, do you think they would be quality lies or easily seen
through?
Is it possible that even you might be impressed by the "Angel of
Light," in "Lamb's clothing" presented as a "servant of righteousness?"
Just how far, if there were a Devil, would he be willing to go to
fool people? Does the Bible portray him as having powers to
deceive the nations?
Are all religions so sacred and possessed of an equally guaranteed
state of validity relative to all the other valid religions that they
are off limits to Satan? Does goodness, purity, honor and respect come
from a mere claim of a religious teaching these days? The answer is yes.
The Bible has loads of scathing rebukes for what seem to be myriad
false religions in all of Scripture. Isn't it odd how we have zero
false religions today? Every single religion is true and right. Every
lifestyle is honorable, true and right.
I think the decision on whether or not Islam is good or evil comes down to 2 things:
1.) Does one have faith in the ferocity with which YHWH, Jesus and
Paul seemed to condemn religious teachings from other sources, even
angels. Does one understand why God was so adamant about this?
2.) Does one believe in love and that "Love does no harm to it's
neighbor?" Has anyone ever harmed anyone in the name of Islam? Is
this a small insignificant number that is tapering off?
The case against Mohammad and Islam is rich, wide and colorful, but sadly the color is always red: Every day blood is spattered on cameras, the earth, hotel walls,
embassy walls, and children's schools in the name of Islam. Have you seen
the photos of the massacre at Beslan in Time Magazine? But other
photos, not so cleaned up, appear elsewhere.
4000 to 2000 years ago, the earth was a primitive place. Slowly but
surely, just like an individual Christian life, the teachings of Christ
tamed the world. His love, though not perfectly realized, has been the
greatest force against bloodshed and in support of equality among men
and women. Take away Christ and the world would still be feeding people
to lions in public arenas, sacrificing children to idols and like
Afghanistan where they refuse to teach little girls or let them have
access to outside media.
Google Greg Mortenson to see what Afghanistan is like for children,
especially little girls. In fact, check out the fate of little girls,
born and unborn in India and China as compared with Christianized
nations. Where Christ is not preached and followed, the little girls
have it the worst.
For several years I've been noting how religions effect the people
on whom it has a stronghold, and it's not easy conveying all that
information quickly - impossible is more like it. But if you study the
way religions effect people's, they are harmful except for true
Christianity. This is not speculation but sociological demographic fact.
When religions stray from Christ, you will find pedophilia, death,
murder and mass suicide. When people fear Jesus - you get churches of
Christ - imperfect, but quite civilized - aka Christianized.
We do not see richly steeped Christian groups killing people. Christ has had an effect.
However, since 600 AD...no other killing machine has persisted like Islam.
Did you listen to the MP3's at GentleIslam.com?
How many young men in the church of Christ would smile while holding
someone's hands that had just been cut off? But how many Muslims do you
think would be so proud?
Did you happen to notice the people jumping from the WTC and
splattering on the ground? Did you happen to notice the Islamic
community around the world laughing, giving each other chocolates and
candy and celebrating?
5:33, The
punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and
strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution,
or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter; [Anyone who disbeliefs in Islam and speaks against it is considered to be waging war against Allah and his messenger]
You might google Islamic stoning, maiming, honor rape, honor burnings, just for a start.
I always feel so dirty when I research or talk about Islam and I often have nightmares at what I see.
I can confidently say, I've never seen or heard of anything that
would make me feel dirty or give me nightmares in the church of Christ.
But there are cute heart warming stories too, like this one:
“My father beat me and told me that I must
marry this man, and if I did not, I would be raped and no law and no
sheikh in this country would help me. I refused but I couldn’t stop the
marriage,” Nojoud Nasser told the Yemen Times. “I asked and begged my
mother, father, and aunt to help me to get divorced. They answered, ‘We
can do nothing. If you want you can go to court by yourself.’ So this
is what I have done,” she said.
Do you know anyone in the church of Christ or that attended your
Seminary that would stab a nun because she was in a Christian play? Do
you know ANYONE that would stab a nun?
But how many muslims do you think would stab a nun? You needn't wonder too long - a whole crowd condoned it:
Do you think this is even the tip of the tip of the tip of the iceberg?
=============
For instance, more than thirteen
centuries ago, the relatively peaceful Muhammad fled Mecca because of
intense persecution. As he fled the city, he left the path of peace
farther and farther behind him. He eventually returned at the head of
an army, and few were brave enough to oppose him. Islamic law was
suddenly supreme, with a host of bloody tales to warn its enemies. A
similar phenomenon occurs in the world today. When Muslims are in the
minority (as they are in America) the message is always "Let us live in
peace with one another, for Islam is a religion of tolerance and
understanding." Then, once Islam has spread throughout the country, the
message suddenly changes to "Anyone who stands against the Prophet is
worthy of death!"
Oddly enough, this tactic has
been remarkably successful for Islam. Despite more than a thousand
years of bloodshed, many people are convinced that Muhammad was a
gentle, humble man who never harmed anyone, and that Islam teaches its
followers to be at peace with everyone who hasn't’t declared war on them.
Then, when someone like Osama bin Laden organizes a group of Muslims in
an attack against thousands of innocent people, everyone says that he
must be insane, and people around the world rush to defend Islam.
The result is simply amazing.
Muslims commit acts of terror in Russia, Spain, America, England,
Israel, and countless other countries around the world, and it actually
causes certain people to support Islam even more! Think about it. A
Muslim blows up a bus, but people don’t want other Muslims to be
persecuted for it, so they start defending Islam. Legislators are among
the most active in this regard. Laws threatening free speech about
Islam are popping up everywhere (even in the United States and Great
Britain[7]), declaring that statements against Islam will not be tolerated. Indeed, Australia is on the verge of sending pastors to prison for quoting passages of the Qur’an![8]
Today’s terrorist attacks in
London, strangely enough, will help Islam grow even stronger. There
will be a brief period of outrage against Islam, but once the smoke has
cleared (both literally and figuratively), the world will once again
rush to defend Islam, and more bills will be passed, "protecting"
Muslims from those who would speak out against Muhammad’s "religion of
peace." No matter how violent Islam becomes, as long as people fail to
recognize that its two faces are part of the same head (and that both
faces are calmly smiling as new laws make Islam untouchable), Muhammad’s empire of faith will thrive in a world of false tolerance.
Perhaps Osama bin Laden isn’t as
crazy as everyone thinks, for his plan seems to be working perfectly.
His attacks are strengthening Islam’s position in the world. In a
curious way, bin Laden is more dedicated to true Islam
than most Muslims are. If Muhammad told Muslims to fight in the name of
God and demonstrated his meaning by killing men, women, and children
for even minor resistance, what should a dedicated Muslim do? Should
devout Muslims live in peace with the infidels around them, or should
they follow Muhammad’s example by murdering the infidels in their beds?[9]
I’m very happy that most Muslims
are willing to live in peace with their neighbors. Yet we have to be
honest here. Benevolent Muslims aren’t peaceful because they are
following the example set by Muhammad. They are peaceful because
they’ve chosen to do what’s right, and because they are willing to live
far better lives than Muhammad himself lived. In fact, many Muslims are
such kind, peaceful, and gentle people that they seem to be following
the example set by another great religious leader—one who died on the
cross for the sins of the world and rose from the dead to prove his
message. This man gave his listeners a sober warning: "Watch
out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but
inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize
them" (Matthew 7:15). And, may I add, we should also watch out for false religions, which come to us crying "Peace! Peace!" when they are built on a foundation of murder and bloodshed.
In progress:
Scott,
You probably remember how God made many promises
that Israel, Judah and various people who failed to fully observe his
commands would become by-words, derided, mocked and ridiculed among the
nations. This happened. If God thought they deserved this, would the
Antichrist, an Antichrist, or the evil entities mentioned in Daniel,
Revelation, Genesis, Job, Isaiah, if they were to mislead and destroy
people, ever merit being called a demon, or lessor things?
I say this because some of the people who take the
effort to research the history and nature of Islam don't always have
sweet, gentle congratulatory sugar boffin things to say about Islam or
Mohammad. Some titles or website names either in their titular or
content aspect hold Mohammad in slightly less regard than, say, Jesus.I
say all this because you might very well dismiss the informational
content due to the derisive trappings. But wait until the end to decide
whether a smidgen of derision might be deserved.
In particular, on my site, I have the Islamic
comic book posted. I think their mocking nature works against the
message they wish to get out among academic liberal types. I would not
do it that way, but if the content is true, it's significant and
someone went to some trouble to assemble that.
Here are some links:
The best place to start is with the MP3 files I
was graciously given the right to post from the Center for the Study of
Political Islam. They give a quick overview, analysis, history and
define basic terms.
In Islam, there is no "natural" sense of morality
or justice that transcends the specific examples and injunctions
outlined in the Quran and the Sunnah. Because Muhammad is considered
Allah's final prophet and the Quran the eternal, unalterable words of
Allah himself, there is also no evolving morality that permits the
modification or integration of Islamic morality with that from other
sources. The entire Islamic moral universe devolves solely from the
life and teachings of Muhammad.
"156 school children lay dead, 150 adults and 26 Islamic terrorists."
Timur massaged her feet and kissed her, and told
her stories about all the water and juice they would drink when it was
finally over. "He was so good to me," Kasumova says. Like the other
children of Beslan, Timur became a soldier that day.
The explosion came at just after 1 p.m. One of
those dangling bombs had apparently detonated. "A wave of burning hot
air hit me and knocked me down," Kasumova says. "I saw two severed
legslying next to me."
What Islam does to a pretty 13 year old blond blue
eyed girl and her Mom on her first day of
school
Historically,
we know of at least one individual who was so impressed by Islam’s
ability to inspire men to kill without question that he concluded that
Islam must be true:
The apostle said, “Kill any Jew that falls into
your power.” Thereupon Muhayyisa bin Mas’ud leapt upon Ibn Sunayna, a
Jewish merchant with whom they had social and business relations, and
killed him. Huwayyisa was not a Muslim at the time though he was the
elder brother. When Muhayyisa killed him Huwayyisa began to beat him,
saying, “You enemy of God, did you kill him when much of the fat on
your belly comes from his wealth?” Muhayyisa answered, “Had the one who
ordered me to kill him ordered me to kill you I would have cut your
head off.” He said that this was the beginning of Huwayyisa’s
acceptance of Islam. The other replied, “By God, if Muhammad had
ordered you to kill me would you have killed me?” He said, “Yes, by
God, had he ordered me to cut off your head I would have done so.” He
exclaimed, “By God, a religion which can bring you to this is
marvelous!” And he became a Muslim.[2]
Muslims terrorized from Spain to India quoting
Quran and Sunna attacking and killing millions who had never attacked
Arabia. Was that all defensive Jihad. Mr Mueenuddin either you are in
denial or using Taqiyya, the islamic deception which quran allows and
which your prophet practiced.
Haven't
checked it out but looks to be a scholarly site on Islam.The Mind of
Jihad: Laurent Murawiec Pretty bright French Intellectual with years of
study of Islam.
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/281833-1
Pick
it up at 41:41 - For a pretty good quote: Things that happen in the
Islamic world do have to do with Islam. If they did not, they would
happen in Latin America, but they don't and they do. He gives some good
insights into the modern Muslim mindset in the middle east - and illuminates the expression "We love death more than you love life. "
Just
some snapshots of things inspired by Mohammad and the force behind him,
all recent:
The Islamic genocide of the Indian Hindus was by far the worst in recorded history.
Will Durant, the famous historian summed it up
like this:"The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest
story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is
that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order
and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by
barbarians invading from without or multiplying within."They stopped
because living zimmies bring more Jizya, that's Muslim for Kaffir
slaves and Zakat taxes which dhimmis are forced to pay.
Will you fight for this woman?
Will you do all within your power to learn and educate yourself and then educate as many others as you can?
If we all work together, we can stop the amputations, beheadings and brutal barbaric scenes of violence, like this one, that happen EVERY DAY BY ISLAMIC SHARIA LAW in countries where Musims reach densities of 6 percent or more.
Please read through the documents, do your own research. The truth is everywhere for those with eyes to see.
One last thing: there is a power called Satan. Don't let him trick you into ignoring the evil in Islam.
The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis. -Dante Alighieri
Political Correctness has nothing to do with truth or real love. Jesus was NEVER politically correct. He'd rather die.
